Sunday, September 8, 2013

Low interest and the "Cash" myth...



For those prepared to take on extra risk, exiting cash may make sense. But for the nearly or already retired, capital preservation is key. For many SMSF trustees, cash remains the preferred defensive asset. Rising competition among banks for consumer deposits means returns are still ahead of the most defensive asset – government bonds.

One of the more strange "finance profession" comments I have recently heard, is "Stay in Cash, you will slowly Fry. PMSL"1
- David Lunn, Director , LifeStyle Wealth Partners.

Fear uncertainty and doubt (FUD), combined with economic jargon slips many trustees into a comatose like state, and rightly so: finance professionals carve out a living making simple subjects seem complex. It’s the best way to convince you to part with your hard-earned money.  Throw away comments like the above, typically have a tendency to be very light on any facts, and often emotive, or personal in focus.

Inflation
So why do we care about inflation? Because it is meant to give us an indication of how the prices we pay for goods and services vary over time. Inflation is one measure of the cost of living. Hence, inflation suddenly becomes important to all savers. We need the savings we set aside for retirement to beat inflation. If we don’t, our nest egg will not keep pace with our lifestyle. And if we’re in retirement, we want our savings to generate returns that, as a minimum, meet or exceed inflation otherwise our purchasing power will shrink.

Since 1982, annual “core” or “underlying” inflation in Australia has averaged about 4 per cent. If we focus only on the period since 1993 when the Reserve Bank of Australia formally started targeting the inflation rate with its chief policy instrument, known as the “target cash rate”, inflation has averaged a touch under 3 per cent.

Hence an overall savings strategy should deliver returns greater than 3 per cent annually with the minimum possible risk.

A related issue is what sectors offer savers effective “inflation hedges”. In this context, there is a pervasive myth that fixed income is a bad inflation hedge. This is both right and wrong. Fixed-rate bonds that pay a set rate of income decline in value in periods when inflation is high and interest rates rise.
This is not hard to understand: if you buy a bond that returns 5 per cent annually for six years and interest rates on other bonds rise to 6 per cent, your bond’s price will fall until its yield makes investors indifferent between the two alternatives.

RBA cash rate and Inflation
This begs the question of whether the RBA’s target cash rate is a good inflation hedge?

The chart below shows the correlation between the RBA’s cash rate and core inflation since 1990. Given the RBA is officially mandated to manage inflation with its policy rate, one finds, the correlation between interest rates and inflation is a strong at around 73 per cent.



The Cash Myth?
Contrary to popular myth, cash is, therefore, an excellent inflation hedge.
But does it give you a “real” return above your cost of living?
If one received, say, 1 per cent annually above the RBA’s cash rate through smart investments in bank deposits, your “real” return after inflation would have averaged about 4 per cent over this period. 


An alternative Strategy
"If the objective is to produce a steady, tax-effective income stream, good quality shares with a long history of paying dividends are a real alternative to a term deposit.
Some current yields are very attractive and if you then add the franking credit, you are looking at a nice, tidy return,” he says.
He adds this strategy requires investors to be comfortable with short-term volatility as their capital will still vary. But by focusing on quality and targeting companies with high dividends, investors may also experience less volatility as typically many are defensive stocks".
- John Donald , Partner and Senior adviser , Ipac Western Australia

Peak Debt and the Effectiveness Monetary Policy
So why has monetary policy become ineffective?
The answer is deceptively simple.
Loose monetary policy is designed to encourage consumption and investment by making current period consumption and riskier assets more attractive, and has historically been an effective tool in this regard.
This is no longer the case because we have collectively reached ‘peak debt’ (at least in most western countries, including Australia).

Whether an individual, organisation or nation state, for any given level of income there is a maximum level of debt that can be accumulated without triggering a repricing of risk. Beyond ‘peak debt’ any further increase leads to a repricing of credit risk – the price that must be paid for that debt.

If you can’t increase income, you can’t increase the debt level. The monetary authorities are trying to send one signal about the pricing of credit, but at a national level the markets are sending exactly the opposite signal – the two just cancel each other out. (There is some increase in consumption because of the cash savings in interest cost, but at a national level this tends to be neutralised because one person’s interest expense is another person’s income).

This is the fundamental cause of Europe’s woes – countries like Greece, Spain and Portugal went past their ‘peak debt’ levels, and their creditors started to re-price their debt because doubts emerged about their credit-worthiness.

The RBA will continue to cut interest rates, but their efforts will be in vain, because many economists, suggest that we have already borrowed as much as we can for our current level of income, given the mining boom is over(and having spent much of the money on non-productive real estate assets, have little in the way of options for driving the improvements in productivity which are a fundamental pre-requisite for increasing the size of the Aussie pie).

Risk
The GFC is still fresh in many people’s minds of many and there are still concerns over the state of the European and US economies, so there is still a comfort factor in bank accounts and term deposits, even if returns may be lower, than some alternatives.

This article looks at cash with a view, that cash, correctly managed, can provide a reasonable return, plus an inflation hedge, with very low risk.

But as always, it is up to the individual SMSF trustee, to get the facts and make an informed decision.

“I can afford to be patient, but to make an acceptable return above inflation, I need to take some risk. Diversification is important because nobody can accurately forecast the future value of any investment.”
- David Murray, Senior Adviser, Credit Suisse


Notes
1. PMSL, is slang for Pissing MySelf Laughing..


Disclaimer The contents of this site should not be understood to be accounting, taxation or investment advice but rather as general product related educational information that may or may not meet your specific requirements.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Your SMSF in the Cloud, the Opportunities...


State of Play
The SMSF Administration industry today is at best a "cottage" industry, characterised by:


  1. High fees, or Lower quoted Base fees, with hidden charges (kick backs), or additional per transaction fees
  2. Very Low levels of automation, when compared to Industry or Retail Superannuation Funds
  3. High levels of individual fund compliance, Superannuation funds audit at the "system" level
  4. No economies of scale, resulting in low levels of specialist SMSF skills, very little "real" understanding of the application of modern day system audits.
  5. Auditability
    a) Could not find a single accounting or SMSF administration platform in use today audited against ISAE 3402.
    b) Most of the feeds, such as brokers, contract notes, registries ect are also not audited. We see recent announced solution which "scrap" data from pdf file raw data, these are not originals or audited, but are being presenting as "true and accurate" data to auditors.
    c) Due to the rise in the variety,and volume of traded instruments, markets and currencies, by SMSF's; auditors have a difficult time auditing the level of complexity and interactions, which in many cases is hidden from the auditor.
    The old "get your bank to send me your bank statement" approach simply does not work, with modern information systems..
    Note in many cases this is not an auditor issue, but is mainly caused by the lack of audited, or even audit-able data available to SMSF auditors.
  6. Trustee access to SMSF information  to make informed decisions
    Very few systems offer a daily "reconciled" set of data to trustees, even less offer "reconciled" daily fund and member positions. This is due to the very low levels of automation in the current systems,and the lack of "audited" data to perform daily reconciliations. Most systems don't even tell you if the reports are "reconciled", you just get a bunch of reports.
  7. Trustees want the advantages of an SMSF (control, direct ownership and flexibility), but typically don't want the day to day compliance issues. Trustees want to concentrate on their Investments for retirement, or during retirement. The majority of trustees really don't want to care about data feeds contract notes, or the myriad of  SISS and ATO accounting issues..
    It is delusional to suggest the typical SMSF Trustee can be an expert in these areas above.  
It is truly a sorry state of affairs..


Cloud Computing

Cloud computing has become an overloaded term, which is used to mean almost anything..

I will use the NIST definition:
"Cloud computing is a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction"
Read "It is a collection of computing and enabling resources, to realise "stuff" like SMSF Admin services when combined with Application Software.. "

What does this mean to the SMSF industry?
We are one of "the" pioneers of "Cloud Computing", way back in 1999; in those days it was called "ASP Providers" (this is now one of the cloud computing "service models" within the above NIST definition).

What we were trying to do, was to overcome the limitation of the current "desktop" accounting packages in use, in those days the pioneers were groups like MYOB and even BGL
It is simply economics, if you want to put a database on a clients desktop computer, it cannot be a $50k enterprise SQL server, it needs to be a very low cost standalone system. Now these same economics applies to almost all elements of the system. To this add the cost of software updates, and the "time lag" of releases to distributed clients.

An important aspect of cloud computing is "Elastic or on-demand processing", this allows me to dynamically scale the processing resources required to meet a specific load, this may be growing the Numbers of funds, or simply doing 100,000 tax returns overnight..
I don't have a fixed capital cost, I simply pay for what is used, and if I am smart about it, I will match this cost to an income stream..

The last advantage is not cloud in itself, but rather that one now has an "enterprise" solution, rather than a set of dis-joint uncontrolled desktop solutions.. This is the ASP or SAAS service model within Cloud computing.

The SAAS model allows for the first time things like an ISAE 3402 audit report to be performed each year for SMSF administration systems. This brings them in line with normal "enterprise" solutions "Google" the systems in Australia with ISAE 3402 reports, they are not desktop solutions. Its is simple economics..

SMSF Automation

It is simply not possible to 100% automate, 100% of the existing SMSF administration tasks today..
It is possible to 100% automate 99.9% of the volume of SMSF administration transaction, with full ISAE 3402 audibility back to the original raw audited source data, i.e unbroken audit chain into the SMSF tax return.

On a typical active investment fund, of the 500->1500 transaction each year, about 10 to 15 transactions will need to be manually entered into the system.. This gets very close to Industry and Retail Superannuation systems.

In an non "cottage" market, this should be reflected in a yearly wholesale SMSF fee with audit, in the sub $300 area, yes lower cost with increased compliance and overall quality.
I call this the "jetstar"(1) SMSF service..

This scale of fees are more than competitive with any Industry and Retail Superannuation Fund ( the Cloud is providing the same economies of scale and enterprise solutions as a Superannuation Fund), and open up the opportunities to the under 30's SMSF market(2), who are currently locked out of the high "minimum balance" SMSF word today..

Our own Cloud  based SMSF administration service, called SMSF365 exists today, and can achieve these objectives.. the "Cottage" SMSF Industry has the choice to merge, as required these capabilities to realise the benefits.. Like all could services they are on-demand, consume as little or as much as required.

And just like the real Jetstar, this approach may not be "the" solution for 100% of the market, my proposition is that just like Jetstar it is an option, always let  the client decide..
The "Qantas" model is going in only one direction "broke", even Virgin has acquired  their own jetstar "tiger" airways.
Just like airline travelers, trustees, accountants can work out what is right for them, and their clients.

I predict that within 5 years, there will only be Cloud based SMSF administration based solutions in existence, and most accounting firms with less than 20 SMSF funds will outsource their back office to a specialist "jetstar" SMSF admin firm..

It is an exciting time for the SMSF Industry.
Enjoy...

Charles Moore
CEO VillageMall Pty Ltd

Ok.. so there must be some downside,what are the risks?

Not all Cloud Services are created equal, just as not all existing SMSF admin services are the same.
Key questions, I recommend you receive answers for::

  1. Is my data being sent out side of Australian jurisdiction ?
    If your SMSF data is being worked on by anyone outside of Australia (Indian, or other located  back office outsourcing is very common, an in all of these cases your data is going outside of Australia, don't listen to the waffle we are accessing your system in Australia)..
  2. If a third party is working on your data, ask if they are SAS70 audited, this is most common standard and is mandated by all the Big players in the USA.. If not I then suggest you ask why not?
  3. Is your data protected in the case of a disaster, i.e geo location  replication.
  4. Is your data "always" encrypted at "rest" and encrypted in "transit".
  5. Can I get my data in a form suitable to store under my control, meet ATO and other regulatory data retention requirements? Ideally this should be in a  vendor neutral format, an IBM 80 EBCDIC char punch card is not much use today.. or even Word Perfect files. I still miss those ctl K->D sequences...
  6. Bottom line you need the information above, you may still make a decision to use the service, even with the risks, but this is an informed decision, your basic right..

    The issue... Your informed consent is required, before your data is sent overseas, after all it is your data.
For the details, take a look at  my blog  Does Your Data Still Call Australia Home


--- notes

1. "Jetstar" is the trade mark of Jetstar Airlines, and  is not related to or in any way connected with this blog..
2. The “2013 Active Management Report” found 46 per cent of recent SMSF investors were under the age of 30, while 44 per cent of the next wave of intending investors were also under 30. -


Disclaimer The contents of this site should not be understood to be accounting, taxation or investment advice but rather as general product related educational information that may or may not meet your specific requirements.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Plutus- Managed Investments for Retail SMSF Trustees



Finally.. after many years of R&D, the ultimate SMSF solution..

For the first time, a true alternative
to Retail and Industry Superannuation funds..

Features:

  • Trustee directed, just select from a range of global, professionally managed Mandates
  •  - just like a traditional managed fund, but you directly "own and control" the securities within the mandate.
  • - mandate can include almost any global market, instrument type and currently 16 different currencies.
  • - get rid of your existing, old school, Managed Funds with the typical 2% plus fees; even when your balance is going south!
  • - get rid of trailing adviser, or SMSF admin kick backs; there are no free lunches..
  • Build your own mandate, via ETF's to get Index coverage of the market, or individual stocks, who does not want to directly own Apple, Google or Coco Cola?
  • We do all the portfolio construction, and re-balancing, all in your name.
  • Integrated on-line 24*7 Global Trader, for those add-hoc trades, on any global market, anywhere, any currency (well almost)
  • All investments, directly owned, and controlled by your SMSF, no unitized, pooled, or embedded tax issues.
  • A Fully Manged solution, no "accounting", data feeds, or traditional old world cottage industry SMSF issues to worry about, we look after them for you.
  • Select your mandate.. and we do the rest.
  • On-line access, with daily reconciled accounts, includes Australian compliance and tax reporting for global mandates, available 24*7*365.
  • Service includes a Managed SMSF Deed service, SISS and ATO compliance, reporting, auditing, actuary if needed, and online tax return submitted to the ATO. All done with our fully integrated SMSF365 service, via one of the leading SMSF administration, and audit firms in Australia.  
  • Plutus, lets you concentrate on building Wealth,  for your retirement, and just like any Industry or Retail Superannuation fund, we do the rest for you.
  • Plutus is SMSF wealth management, made easy for Retail Australian Trustees.

Ask about our "one-click" Plutus solution to move your existing Industry or Retail Superannuation account across to the next generation SMSF solution.

Get all the benefits of an Enterprise Retail/Industry Superannuation solution, but with direct control and ownership, of global securities, with none of the old world SMSF complexities or hassles.

Gen X/Y, ask about the Plutus online solution to start your, no hassle, wealth accumulation.



Take control, with direct ownership of your retirement Wealth!

Start 2013 on the right footing, open a Plutus account today.


Enjoy..
Charles Moore

Accounting Practices, retain your clients, stay out of the "with advice AFSL world" , but back office all SMSF drudgery to us.

Dealer Groups/Advisersretain your clients, concentrate on providing professional Investment Advice on a fee for service basis, outsource all the portfolio and and SMSF drudgery, and compliance to us.

Retail or Industry Superannuation Fundsretain your clients, by offering an Enterprise SMSF solution out of the box. We take away the SMSF specific compliance pain, while providing a standardized enterprise solution, via our private label service.


PS: If you hear about "next generation SMSF", this appears to be the season for these,  then see their lists of features if  a lot of technology, accounting, data feeds, or even contract notes, or registry data, your are looking at an old world solution..
Time to compare to the truly next generation Plutus Managed SMSF Service..



Disclaimer The contents of this site should not be understood to be accounting, taxation or investment advice but rather as general product related educational information that may or may not meet your specific requirements.